May 28, 2024
Species
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2023)Cite this article 22 Altmetric Metrics details The kākāpō is a critically endangered, intensively managed, long-lived nocturnal parrot endemic to Aotearoa New Zealand.
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2023)Cite this article
22 Altmetric
Metrics details
The kākāpō is a critically endangered, intensively managed, long-lived nocturnal parrot endemic to Aotearoa New Zealand. We generated and analysed whole-genome sequence data for nearly all individuals living in early 2018 (169 individuals) to generate a high-quality species-wide genetic variant callset. We leverage extensive long-term metadata to quantify genome-wide diversity of the species over time and present new approaches using probabilistic programming, combined with a phenotype dataset spanning five decades, to disentangle phenotypic variance into environmental and genetic effects while quantifying uncertainty in small populations. We find associations for growth, disease susceptibility, clutch size and egg fertility within genic regions previously shown to influence these traits in other species. Finally, we generate breeding values to predict phenotype and illustrate that active management over the past 45 years has maintained both genome-wide diversity and diversity in breeding values and, hence, evolutionary potential. We provide new pathways for informing future conservation management decisions for kākāpō, including prioritizing individuals for translocation and monitoring individuals with poor growth or high disease risk. Overall, by explicitly addressing the challenge of the small sample size, we provide a template for the inclusion of genomic data that will be transformational for species recovery efforts around the globe.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Genomic reads, variant data and phenotypic data are taonga of Ngāi Tahu and sensitive for the Department of Conservation. Raw and processed data, such as variant files, are available via application to the Aotearoa Genomic Data Repository https://data.agdr.org.nz/.
Scripts, workflows, Jupyter notebooks and other methodology resources are available at the GitHub repo for this paper: https://github.com/GenomicsAotearoa/Kakapo or at Zenodo103.
Ouborg, N. J., Pertoldi, C., Loeschcke, V., Bijlsma, R. K. & Hedrick, P. W. Conservation genetics in transition to conservation genomics. Trends Genet. 26, 177–187 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Formenti, G. et al. The era of reference genomes in conservation genomics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 197–202 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kardos, M. et al. The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2104642118 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kardos, M. & Shafer, A. B. A. The peril of gene-targeted conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 827–839 (2018).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Wright, B. R., Hogg, C. J., McLennan, E. A., Belov, K. & Grueber, C. E. Assessing evolutionary processes over time in a conservation breeding program: a combined approach using molecular data, simulations and pedigree analysis. Biodivers. Conserv. 30, 1011–1029 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Robinson, J. A. et al. Genomic flatlining in the endangered island fox. Curr. Biol. 26, 1183–1189 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sherwin, W. B., Murray, N. D., Graves, J. A. M. & Brown, P. R. Measurement of genetic variation in endangered populations: bandicoots (Marsupialia: Peramelidae) as an example. Conserv. Biol. 5, 103–108 (1991).
Article Google Scholar
Mitrovski, P., Hoffmann, A. A., Heinze, D. A. & Weeks, A. R. Rapid loss of genetic variation in an endangered possum. Biol. Lett. 4, 134–138 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, M. & Jarne, P. The effects of a bottleneck on inbreeding depression and the genetic load. Am. Nat. 155, 154–167 (2000).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Taylor, R. S., Jensen, E. L., Coltman, D. W., Foote, A. D. & Lamichhaney, S. Seeing the whole picture: what molecular ecology is gaining from whole genomes. Mol. Ecol. 30, 5917–5922 (2021).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Williams, G. R. The kakapo (Strigops habrotilus, Gray): a review and reappraisal of a near-extinct species (New Zealand Wildlife Service, 1956).
Lentini, P. E., Stirnemann, I. A., Stojanovic, D., Worthy, T. H. & Stein, J. A. Using fossil records to inform reintroduction of the kakapo as a refugee species. Biol. Conserv. 217, 157–165 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Karl, B. J. & Best, H. A. Feral cats on Stewart Island; their foods, and their effects on kakapo. N. Z. J. Zool. 9, 287–293 (1982).
Article Google Scholar
Lloyd, B. D. & Powlesland, R. G. The decline of kakapo Strigops habroptilus and attempts at conservation by translocation. Biol. Conserv. 69, 75–85 (1994).
Article Google Scholar
Merton, D. V., Morris, R. B. & Atkinson, I. A. E. Lek behaviour in a parrot: the kakapo Strigops habroptilus of New Zealand. Ibis 126, 277–283 (1984).
Article Google Scholar
Clout, M. N. & Merton, D. V. Saving the kakapo: the conservation of the world’s most peculiar parrot. Bird Conserv. Int. 8, 281–296 (1998).
Article Google Scholar
Elliott, G. P., Merton, D. V. & Jansen, P. W. Intensive management of a critically endangered species: the kakapo. Biol. Conserv. 99, 121–133 (2001).
Article Google Scholar
Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement Act 1998 No 97 (version as at 1 July 2022), Public Act Contents (New Zealand Legislation, 2022); https://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1998/0097/latest/DLM429090.html
Savage, J. L., Crane, J. M. S., Team, K. R. & Hemmings, N. Low hatching success in the critically endangered kakapo is driven by early embryo mortality not infertility. Anim. Conserv. 25, 352–360 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
White, K. L., Eason, D. K., Jamieson, I. G. & Robertson, B. C. Evidence of inbreeding depression in the critically endangered parrot, the kakapo. Anim. Conserv. 18, 341–347 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Bergner, L. M., Jamieson, I. G. & Robertson, B. C. Combining genetic data to identify relatedness among founders in a genetically depauperate parrot, the Kakapo (Strigops habroptilus). Conserv. Genet. 15, 1013–1020 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Robertson, B. C. The role of genetics in kakapo recovery. Notornis 53, 173 (2006).
Google Scholar
Miller, H. C., Lambert, D. M., Millar, C. D., Robertson, B. C. & Minot, E. O. Minisatellite DNA profiling detects lineages and parentage in the endangered kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) despite low microsatellite DNA variation. Conserv. Genet. 4, 265–274 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Robertson, B. C., Frauenfelder, N., Eason, D. K., Elliott, G. & Moorhouse, R. Thirty polymorphic microsatellite loci from the critically endangered kakapo (Strigops habroptilus). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9, 664–666 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rhie, A. et al. Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature 592, 737–746 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dussex, N. et al. Population genomics of the critically endangered kākāpō. Cell 1, 100002 (2021).
CAS Google Scholar
Nurk, S. et al. The complete sequence of a human genome. Science 376, 44–53 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cai, C. et al. Brassica rapa Genome 2.0: a reference upgrade through sequence re-assembly and gene re-annotation. Mol. Plant 10, 649–651 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Holt, C. et al. Improved genome assembly and annotation for the rock pigeon (Columba livia). G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 8, 1391–1398 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li, Y., Pi, M., Gao, Q., Liu, Z. & Kang, C. Updated annotation of the wild strawberry Fragaria vesca V4 genome. Hortic. Res. 6, 61 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yun, T. et al. Accurate, scalable cohort variant calls using DeepVariant and GLnexus. Bioinformatics 36, 5582–5589 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lin, Y.-L. et al. Comparison of GATK and DeepVariant by trio sequencing. Sci. Rep. 12, 1809 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Supernat, A., Vidarsson, O. V., Steen, V. M. & Stokowy, T. Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing. Sci. Rep. 8, 17851 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Poplin, R. et al. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 983–987 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pei, S. et al. Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbaa148 (2021).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Galla, S. J. et al. The relevance of pedigrees in the conservation genomics era. Mol. Ecol. 31, 41–54 (2022).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Duntsch, L. et al. Polygenic basis for adaptive morphological variation in a threatened Aotearoa | New Zealand bird, the hihi (Notiomystis cincta). Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20200948 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
John, S. & Stephan, W. Important role of genetic drift in rapid polygenic adaptation. Ecol. Evol. 10, 1278–1287 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Santure, A. W. & Garant, D. Wild GWAS—association mapping in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18, 729–738 (2018).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Bosse, M. et al. Recent natural selection causes adaptive evolution of an avian polygenic trait. Science 358, 365–368 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Foster, Y. et al. Genomic signatures of inbreeding in a critically endangered parrot, the kākāpō. G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 11, jkab307 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Curtin, S. J. et al. Validating genome-wide association candidates controlling quantitative variation in nodulation. Plant Physiol. 173, 921–931 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595 (1989).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Renaud, G., Hanghøj, K., Korneliussen, T. S., Willerslev, E. & Orlando, L. Joint estimates of heterozygosity and runs of homozygosity for modern and ancient samples. Genetics 212, 587–614 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wright, S. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am. Nat. 56, 330–338 (1922).
Article Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. A fuller theory of ‘junctions’ in inbreeding. Heredity 8, 187–197 (1954).
Article Google Scholar
Keller, M. C., Visscher, P. M. & Goddard, M. E. Quantification of inbreeding due to distant ancestors and its detection using dense single nucleotide polymorphism data. Genetics 189, 237–249 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, Z. et al. Genetic variations for egg quality of chickens at late laying period revealed by genome-wide association study. Sci. Rep. 8, 10832 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, L.-C., Ning, Z.-H., Xu, G.-Y., Hou, Z.-C. & Yang, N. Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of egg quality traits in brown-egg dwarf layers. Poult. Sci. 84, 1209–1213 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Elliott, G. P. Productivity of kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) on offshore island refuges. Notornis 53, 138–142 (2006).
Google Scholar
Cottam, Y., Merton, D. V. & Hendricks, W. Nutrient composition of the diet of parent-raised kakapo nestlings. Notornis 53, 90 (2006).
Google Scholar
Biedrzycki, R. J., Sier, A. E., Liu, D., Dreikorn, E. N. & Weeks, D. E. Spinning convincing stories for both true and false association signals. Genet. Epidemiol. 43, 356–364 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dash, G. K. et al. in Bioinformatics in Rice Research: Theories and Techniques (eds Gupta, M. K. & Behera, L.) 413–457 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3993-7_19 (Springer, 2021).
Haque, M. R., Ansari, S. H., Najmi, A. K. & Ahmad, M. A. Monoterpene phenolic compound thymol prevents high fat diet induced obesity in murine model. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 24, 116–123 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Davydov, E. V. et al. Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1001025 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huber, C. D., Kim, B. Y. & Lohmueller, K. E. Population genetic models of GERP scores suggest pervasive turnover of constrained sites across mammalian evolution. PLoS Genet. 16, e1008827 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
García-Dorado, A. & Caballero, A. Neutral genetic diversity as a useful tool for conservation biology. Conserv. Genet. 22, 541–545 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Bertorelle, G. et al. Genetic load: genomic estimates and applications in non-model animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 492–503 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mathur, S. & DeWoody, J. A. Genetic load has potential in large populations but is realized in small inbred populations. Evol. Appl. 14, 1540–1557 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Schubert, M., Lindgreen, S. & Orlando, L. AdapterRemoval v2: rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging. BMC Res. Notes 9, 88 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Andrews, S. et al. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data (Babraham Bioinformatics, 2010); https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
Ewels, P., Magnusson, M., Lundin, S. & Käller, M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics 32, 3047–3048 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1303.3997 (2013).
Danecek, P. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10, giab008 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, G. A. & O’Connor, B. D. Genomics in the Cloud: Using Docker, GATK, and WDL in Terra (O’Reilly Media, 2020).
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Narasimhan, V. et al. BCFtools/RoH: a hidden Markov model approach for detecting autozygosity from next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32, 1749–1751 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. GigaScience 4, 7 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, H. & Ralph, P. Local PCA shows how the effect of population structure differs along the genome. Genetics 211, 289–304 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guhlin, J. & Ralph, P. jguhlin/lostruct-py: 0.0.4. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4001195 (2020).
scikit-bio Development Team. scikit-bio: a bioinformatics library for data scientists, students, and developers. GitHub https://github.com/biocore/scikit-bio/issues/1691 (2020).
Whalen, A., Ros-Freixedes, R., Wilson, D. L., Gorjanc, G. & Hickey, J. M. Hybrid peeling for fast and accurate calling, phasing, and imputation with sequence data of any coverage in pedigrees. Genet. Sel. Evol. 50, 67 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Killick, R., Haynes, K. & Eckley, I. changepoint: an R package for changepoint analysis. J. Stat. Soft. 58, 1–19 (2014).
Killick, R., Fearnhead, P. & Eckley, I. A. Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear computational cost. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 107, 1590–1598 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hedrick, P. W. & Lacy, R. C. Measuring relatedness between inbred individuals. J. Hered. 106, 20–25 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Waples, R. K., Albrechtsen, A. & Moltke, I. Allele frequency-free inference of close familial relationships from genotypes or low-depth sequencing data. Mol. Ecol. 28, 35–48 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dodds, K. G. et al. Construction of relatedness matrices using genotyping-by-sequencing data. BMC Genomics 16, 1047 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Galla, S. J. et al. A comparison of pedigree, genetic and genomic estimates of relatedness for informing pairing decisions in two critically endangered birds: implications for conservation breeding programmes worldwide. Evol. Appl. 13, 991–1008 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, J. Parentage and sibship exclusions: higher statistical power with more family members. Heredity 99, 205–217 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hauser, S. S., Galla, S. J., Putnam, A. S., Steeves, T. E. & Latch, E. K. Comparing genome-based estimates of relatedness for use in pedigree-based conservation management. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 22, 2546–2558 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F. et al. scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
Google Scholar
Eason, D. K. & Moorhouse, R. J. Hand-rearing kakapo (Strigops habroptilus), 1997–2005. Notornis 53, 116 (2006).
Google Scholar
von Hurst, P. R., Moorhouse, R. J. & Raubenheimer, D. Preferred natural food of breeding kakapo is a high value source of calcium and vitamin D. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 164, 177–179 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
TensorFlow Developers. TensorFlow. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4960227 (2021).
TensorFlow Developers. TensorFlow (v2.8.0). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5949125 (2022).
Crispim, A. C. et al. Multi-trait GWAS and new candidate genes annotation for growth curve parameters in Brahman cattle. PLoS ONE 10, e0139906 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Winsor, C. P. The Gompertz curve as a growth curve. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 18, 1–8 (1932).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kluyver, T. et al. Jupyter notebooks—a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. Elpub 2016, 87–90 (2016).
Google Scholar
Habier, D., Fernando, R. L., Kizilkaya, K. & Garrick, D. J. Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinform. 12, 186 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Legarra, A., Robert-Granié, C., Croiseau, P., Guillaume, F. & Fritz, S. Improved Lasso for genomic selection. Genet. Res. 93, 77–87 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yin, L. L., Zhang, H. H., Li, X. Y., Zhao, S. H. & Liu X.L. hibayes: an R package to fit individual-level, summary-level and single-step Bayesian regression models for genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.12.480230 (2022).
Moser, G. et al. Simultaneous discovery, estimation and prediction analysis of complex traits using a Bayesian mixture model. PLoS Genet. 11, e1004969 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bradbury, P. J. et al. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23, 2633–2635 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yu, J. et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38, 203–208 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Endelman, J. B. & Jannink, J.-L. Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix. G3 Genes Genom. Genet. 2, 1405–1413 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Klopfenstein, D. V. et al. GOATOOLS: a Python library for Gene Ontology analyses. Sci. Rep. 8, 10872 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cantalapiedra, C. P., Hernández-Plaza, A., Letunic, I., Bork, P. & Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 5825–5829 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D309–D314 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H.-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 18, 366–368 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Guhlin, J., et al. GenomicsAotearoa/Kakapo: publication scripts and workflows. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8015520 (2023).
Taylor, H. R. The use and abuse of genetic marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding. Ecol. Evol. 5, 3140–3150 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lacy, R. C., Ballou, J. D. & Pollak, J. P. PMx: software package for demographic and genetic analysis and management of pedigreed populations. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 433–437 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
Download references
We are grateful to the Kākāpō125+ Project led by the New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC) in partnership with Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu (TRONT). We acknowledge the incredible long-term support and vision from Ngāi Tahu, DOC staff, including office-based support staff, and the many volunteers, veterinarians and others who have contributed to the conservation of this taonga species. Our thanks to the Genetic Rescue Foundation, University of Otago, New Zealand Genomics Limited, Rockefeller Institute, Duke University, Science Exchange and Experiment.com for the generation and availability of the short-read data used in this study. B.C.R. acknowledges support from the Department of Zoology, University of Otago, for funding sample preparation. We extend many thanks to Genomics Aotearoa for financial support of the project including for J.G., J.W., E.K., N.J.G., T.E.S., A.W.S. and P.K.D. We are very grateful to New Zealand eScience Infrastructure for computational resources and support, especially for assistance with data management, transfer and storage, and development and hosting of the AGDR (https://data.agdr.org.nz/), with particular thanks to Dinindu Senanayake.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Tammy E. Steeves, Anna W. Santure, Peter K. Dearden.
Genomics Aotearoa, Biochemistry Department, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa New Zealand
Joseph Guhlin, Marissa F. Le Lec & Peter K. Dearden
School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Aotearoa New Zealand
Jana Wold, Stephanie J. Galla & Tammy E. Steeves
The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd, Palmerston North, Aotearoa New Zealand
Emily Koot
School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, Aotearoa New Zealand
David Winter, Patrick J. Biggs & Murray P. Cox
School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, Aotearoa New Zealand
Patrick J. Biggs
Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA
Stephanie J. Galla
Department of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa New Zealand
Lara Urban & Neil J. Gemmell
Helmholtz Pioneer Campus, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Neuherberg, Germany
Lara Urban
Helmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Neuherberg, Germany
Lara Urban
School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
Lara Urban
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa New Zealand
Yasmin Foster, Fiona E. Robertson & Bruce C. Robertson
Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
Murray P. Cox
Kākāpō Recovery Programme, Department of Conservation, Invercargill, Aotearoa New Zealand
Andrew Digby, Lydia R. Uddstrom, Daryl Eason, Deidre Vercoe, Karen Andrew, Lisa Argilla, Karen Arnold, James Bohan, Liam Bolitho, Nichy Brown, Jo Carpenter, Jodie Crane, Margie Grant, Glen Greaves, Brett Halkett, Rory Hannan, Sam Haultain, Bryony Hitchcock, Leigh Joyce, Sara Larcombe, Jo Ledington, Jinty MacTavish, Phil Marsh, Gilbert Mingam, Freya Moore, Lyndsay Murray, Errol Nye, Jake Osborne, Lou Parker, Chris Phillips, Roy Phillips, Brodie Philp, Tim Raemaekers, Jenny Rickett, Rachel Rouse, Rachael Sagar, Alisha Sherriff, Theo Thompson, Jason Van de Wetering, Nicki van Zyl, Jen Waite & Jim Watts
Rakiura Tītī Islands Administering Body, Invercargill, Aotearoa New Zealand
Tāne Davis
Neurogenetics of Language Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
Jason T. Howard
Mirxes, Cambridge, MA, USA
Jason T. Howard
The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
Erich D. Jarvis
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
Erich D. Jarvis
School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand
Anna W. Santure
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Conceptualization: all authors; methodology: J.G., M.F.L.L., E.K., D.W., P.J.B., S.J.G., A.W.S. and J.W.; software and formal analysis: J.G., M.F.L.L., E.K., D.W., P.J.B., S.J.G. and M.P.C.; validation: L.U., Y.F., D.W., P.J.B. and M.P.C.; investigation, resources and data curation: A.D., L.R.U., D.E., D.V., Kākāpō Recovery Team, L.U., B.C.R., F.E.R., D.W., P.J.B., M.P.C. and T.D.; writing—original draft: J.G.; writing—review and editing: J.G., P.K.D., M.F.L.L., A.W.S., L.U., E.D.J., Y.F., T.E.S., E.K., S.J.G., A.D., L.R.U., J.W. and N.J.G; visualization: J.G., E.K., M.F.L.L. and S.J.G.; supervision: T.E.S., A.W.S. and P.K.D.; project administration: J.G. and P.K.D.; funding acquisition: P.K.D., A.W.S., T.E.S., B.C.R., J.T.H. and E.D.J.
Correspondence to Peter K. Dearden.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Rebecca Taylor, Cock van Oosterhout and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Violin plot of all calculated Breeding Values for each trait, with individual breeding values represented as points on the left of the distributions. Green points and distributions represent all birds exclusive of Richard Henry and his lineage, while tan represents Richard Henry and lineage scores (n = 8). Aspergillosis Risk is a risk score derived from case-control (see Supplemental Materials: Aspergillosis Susceptibility for details).
Supplementary text including Supplementary Figs. 1–74.
Supplementary Tables 1–25.
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and Permissions
Guhlin, J., Le Lec, M.F., Wold, J. et al. Species-wide genomics of kākāpō provides tools to accelerate recovery. Nat Ecol Evol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02165-y
Download citation
Received: 26 November 2022
Accepted: 11 July 2023
Published: 28 August 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02165-y
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative